quantumcomputingcost
Macro photograph of a superconducting quantum processor chip mounted on its gold-plated carrier
cost-ref:2026.06.03

What it costs to run a quantum circuit in 2026: a vendor-neutral price reference.

Rent access
from $0
A real 10,000-shot job
about $4.55
Own the machine
$8,900 to $20M
In one line: quantum computing cost splits two ways. Renting cloud access runs from free (IBM Open Plan, up to 10 minutes of QPU time per month) and $0.000425/shot (AWS Braket on Rigetti) up to $96/minute (IBM Pay-As-You-Go) or $125,000+/month (Quantinuum on Azure); a 10,000-shot circuit on Braket costs about $4.55. Buying a physical machine runs from about $8,900 (a SpinQ desktop teaching unit) to about $2.85 million (a Rigetti Novera system) to $20 million (a D-Wave Advantage2), with utility-scale IBM systems quoted privately at no published price. Almost everyone rents.
Estimate your job: the cost calculator ranks every provider by the cost of your circuit. See the full quantum computer price list (cloud access and physical purchase), how to rent a quantum computer by the shot, minute, hour or month, the desktop quantum computer price for personal machines, the quantum CPU price for the bare processor, the cost to build a quantum computer for the component and programme view, or the IBM Quantum System Two price to own a full system. Jump to a platform: AWS Braket · Azure Quantum · IBM Quantum · Google Willow · D-Wave. Vendor deep-dives: IonQ (Braket vs Azure) · Rigetti (Braket vs Azure).
Abstract

Pricing on quantum computing cloud access is structurally heterogeneous. AWS Braket publishes per-shot and per-task fees, Azure Quantum publishes a per-program formula and a monthly subscription, IBM Quantum publishes a per-minute Pay-As-You-Go rate (Open / Flex / Premium tiers), and several providers remain quote-only. We summarise verified 2026 list prices across 20 cloud-accessible quantum offerings, document the formula-based pricing models that prevent simple cross-provider comparison, and report use-case costs for representative circuit sizes. Every row was re-verified on 2026-09-07: 17 of 20 entries are verified against the provider's primary pricing page, including IBM's four tiers read directly from ibm.com/quantum/pricing and the Braket rates cross-checked against the AWS Price List API; 2 are quote-only (Google Willow, D-Wave commercial Leap); 1 has been withdrawn by its cloud (IonQ Aria on AWS Braket) and is kept as a historical reference rather than a price.

1.Pricing models in 2026

Three pricing paradigms coexist. Per-shot models (AWS Braket across all providers) charge a flat task fee plus a per-shot fee, making a 10,000-shot IonQ Forte circuit cost approximately $800 and the equivalent Rigetti Cepheus circuit approximately $5 — a ratio of more than 175×, driven primarily by per-shot pricing differences across qubit technologies 1. Per-minute models (IBM Quantum) charge for QPU runtime in seconds, with effective rates of $96/min PAYG, $72/min Flex, $48/min Premium 34. Per-program models (Azure Quantum AQT formula) charge a minimum per execution plus separate fees for one-qubit and two-qubit gate shots, making minimum-charge floors load-bearing in cost estimation 2.

The implication for budget estimation: a headline shot rate cannot be compared meaningfully across Braket and Azure without computing the representative circuit. Where this paper cites a unit price, we additionally cite a representative circuit cost in Table 3.

2.Provider inventory

Table 1 — Cloud-accessible QPU offerings, 2026

ProviderHardwareTechQubitsPriceStatus
IBM Quantum — Open PlanIBM Heron r2 / Eagle systemssuperconducting156$0
free
verified primary
IBM Quantum — Pay-As-You-GoIBM Heron r2 / r3 (156Q), Nighthawk r1 (120Q)superconducting156$96
per QPU minute
verified primary
IBM Quantum — Flex PlanIBM Heron r2 / r3 (156Q)superconducting156$72
per QPU minute
verified primary
IBM Quantum — PremiumIBM Heron r2 / r3 (156Q), Nighthawk r1 (120Q)superconducting156$48
per QPU minute
verified primary
AWS Braket — IonQ ForteIonQ Forte (36 qubits, Yb-171+ trapped-ion)trapped-ion36$0.08
per shot
verified primary
AWS Braket — IonQ Aria (withdrawn)IonQ Aria (25 qubits, Yb-171+ trapped-ion)trapped-ion25withdrawn
n/a
retired
AWS Braket — Rigetti Cepheus-1-108QRigetti Cepheus-1-108Q (12 × 9-qubit chiplets, Ankaa-class)superconducting108$0.000425
per shot
verified primary
AWS Braket — QuEra AquilaQuEra Aquila (analog Hamiltonian simulator, Rydberg)neutral-atom256$0.01
per shot
verified primary
AWS Braket — IQM GarnetIQM Garnet (20-qubit superconducting)superconducting20$0.00145
per shot
verified primary
AWS Braket — IQM EmeraldIQM Emerald (54-qubit superconducting, Crystal 54)superconducting54$0.0016
per shot
verified primary
AWS Braket — AQT IBEX-Q1AQT IBEX-Q1 (12-qubit trapped-ion, calcium-40)trapped-ion12$0.0235
per shot
verified primary
Azure Quantum — IonQ Aria 1 (PAYG)IonQ Aria 1 (25-qubit trapped-ion)trapped-ion25$12.42-97.5
per program (minimum)
verified primary
Azure Quantum — IonQ Forte (PAYG)IonQ Forte 1 / Forte Enterprise 1 (36-qubit trapped-ion)trapped-ion36$25.79-168.2
per program (minimum)
verified primary
Azure Quantum — Quantinuum H2 StandardQuantinuum H2 (56-qubit trapped-ion, QCCD)trapped-ion56$125,000
per month
verified primary
Azure Quantum — Quantinuum H2 PremiumQuantinuum H2 (56-qubit trapped-ion, QCCD)trapped-ion56$175,000
per month
verified primary
Azure Quantum — Rigetti CepheusRigetti Cepheus-1-108Qsuperconducting108$0.02
per 10-ms
verified primary
Azure Quantum — Pasqal FresnelPasqal Fresnel (Orion Beta generation)neutral-atom100$3,487
per QPU hour
verified primary
Google Quantum AI — WillowWillow (Sycamore-class successor)superconducting105quote
n/a
quote only
D-Wave Leap — TrialAdvantage2 (Zephyr topology)annealer4400$0
free trial
verified primary
D-Wave Leap — CommercialAdvantage2 (4,400+ flux-qubit annealer)annealer4400quote
n/a
quote only

Every row re-verified 2026-09-07 against its primary source, with the AWS Braket rates cross-checked against the AWS Price List API (publication 2026-08-31). Annealer paradigm (D-Wave) is included for completeness but pricing is not directly comparable to gate-model machines. Pasqal Fresnel is priced in EUR (3,000/QPU-hr), converted at the ECB reference rate of 1.1622 USD/EUR (2026-09-04). Google Willow is research-access only and carries no published price.

3.AWS Braket pricing: the full published rate card

AWS Braket charges $0.30 per task on every QPU, plus a per-shot rate that depends entirely on which machine you pick. The spread across devices is more than 180x per shot, so device choice, not shot count, is what actually sets a Braket bill. A 10,000-shot circuit is about $4.55 on Rigetti Cepheus and about $800.30 on IonQ Forte, from the same task fee and the same shot count.

Table 2 — AWS Braket published QPU rates, per shot and reserved

DevicePer shot10,000-shot taskReservation, per hour
Rigetti Cepheus$0.000425$4.55$4,100.00
IQM Garnet$0.00145$14.80$3,000.00
IQM Emerald$0.00160$16.30$4,000.00
QuEra Aquila$0.01000$100.30$2,500.00
AQT IBEX-Q1$0.02350$235.30$4,800.00
IonQ Forte$0.08000$800.30$7,000.00

Per-task fee and per-shot rates taken from aws.amazon.com/braket/pricing, verified 7 September 2026. The 10,000-shot column is our arithmetic over those rates: $0.30 task fee plus 10,000 x the per-shot price, so you can redo it. Reservation rates are Braket Direct dedicated-access hourly prices from the same page. On-demand simulators bill per minute of runtime in one-millisecond increments with a three-second minimum per simulation; embedded simulators inside Hybrid Jobs carry no separate charge.

The reservation column is the part most Braket comparisons miss. Dedicated access runs $2,500 to $7,000 an hour depending on the machine, which reframes the per-shot rates entirely: an hour of reserved Rigetti Cepheus at $4,100 buys roughly 9.6 million shots at the on-demand rate, so reservations are about guaranteed uninterrupted access and scheduling, not about unit cost. Reserve when the schedule matters. Pay per shot when it does not.

4.Use-case cost reference

We tabulate representative circuit costs to make the per-shot and per-program rates concrete. A 100-shot pilot circuit on IonQ Forte via Braket costs $8.30; the same circuit on Rigetti Cepheus costs $0.34. A 200,000-shot VQE optimisation, run as 200 tasks of 1,000 shots, costs $16,060 on IonQ Forte but $145 on Rigetti, illustrating the cost-vs-fidelity trade-off that determines hardware choice for variational workloads 1.

Table 3 — Representative circuit costs (USD)

Use caseShotsCost (USD)
100-shot circuit on IonQ Forte (Braket, no mitigation)1008.30
10,000-shot circuit on IonQ Forte (Braket)10,000800.30
100-shot circuit on IQM Garnet (Braket)1000.45
10,000-shot circuit on IQM Garnet (Braket)10,00014.80
100-shot circuit on Rigetti Cepheus-108Q (Braket)1000.34
10,000-shot circuit on Rigetti Cepheus-108Q (Braket)10,0004.55
VQE optimisation, ~200 iter × 1k shots on IonQ Forte200,00016060.00
VQE optimisation, ~200 iter × 1k shots on Rigetti200,000145.00
Single IonQ Aria 1 program on Azure (default mitigation on)—97.50
1 minute IBM Heron r2 PAYG—96.00

All Braket figures include the $0.30/task fee; the VQE rows carry it 200 times, once per iteration. Azure IonQ Aria minimum reflects error-mitigation-on default; mitigation-off floor is $12.42.

5.Two-qubit gate fidelity context

Headline shot prices conceal a fidelity-vs-cost trade-off. Per-shot superconducting access (Rigetti, IBM Heron) is cheaper but operates at ~99.1-99.7% two-qubit fidelity; trapped-ion access (IonQ, Quantinuum) operates at ~99.5-99.8% production fidelity, with research-grade demonstrations of 99.99% via electronic qubit control 8. For algorithms that require deep circuits, the higher-fidelity provider often produces useful results at fewer shots, partially offsetting the per-shot premium.

Table 4 — Reported two-qubit gate fidelities, production hardware

Hardware2Q fidelityYear
Oxford Ionics (now IonQ) electronic-control gate99.97%2024
IonQ R&D prototype (electronic qubit control)99.99%2025
Quantinuum H2 (production)99.80%2024
IBM Heron r2 (ibm_kingston, 156Q)99.70%2024
IonQ Forte (36Q production)99.60%2022
IonQ Aria (25Q production)99.50%2022
Rigetti Cepheus-1-108Q (production, Apr 2026)99.10%2026

6.Notes on quote-only sources

IBM's own pricing page became fetchable again and was read directly on 2026-09-07, so IBM's rates are now primary-sourced rather than industry-reported. IBM publishes: Open Plan free for up to 10 minutes of runtime per month; Pay-As-You-Go $96/minute with a 1-second minimum purchase; Flex from $72/minute against a 400-minute annual minimum, a $28,800 annual floor; Premium from $48/minute against a 5,200-minute annual minimum, a $249,600 annual floor; On-Prem by quote. The two committed tiers are only cheaper above their break-even: 400 minutes at $72 equals 300 minutes at $96, so Flex loses to Pay-As-You-Go below 300 QPU-minutes a year. Production D-Wave Leap pricing has not been republished as a public list since 2023 industry coverage; we mark it quote-only rather than cite stale figures. Google Willow is accessible through a competitive early-access programme, selected by proposal (the latest cohort's submission deadline was 15 May 2026) 9, and is not commercially priced.

7.Re-verification cadence

Provider pricing pages are re-fetched every 90 days. The pre-deploy gate blocks publication of any change containing a stale dated row. AWS Braket's full rate card, per-task fee, per-shot device prices and Braket Direct reservation hourly rates, was re-read against aws.amazon.com/braket/pricing on 2026-09-07 and matches Table 2. IBM's four published tiers were read directly from ibm.com/quantum/pricing on the same date; the per-minute rates are unchanged from earlier industry corroboration, and the annual minimums behind Flex and Premium (400 and 5,200 minutes) are new to this page as a result. Azure Quantum was re-read on the same date: its pricing doc still carries a 2026-04-23 update stamp and every rate matches. The Braket figures were also cross-checked against the AWS Price List API (publication 2026-08-31), and IonQ Aria was confirmed withdrawn from the Braket device list.

8.Frequently asked questions

How much does a quantum computer cost in 2026?

There are two different questions. Renting cloud access to a quantum computer ranges from free (IBM's Open Plan, up to 10 minutes of runtime per month) to a few cents per shot (AWS Braket on Rigetti, $0.000425/shot) up to $96 per minute (IBM Pay-As-You-Go) or $125,000+ per month (Quantinuum subscription on Azure). Buying a physical quantum computer spans a huge range: about $8,900 for a SpinQ desktop teaching unit, about $2.85 million for a complete Rigetti Novera system, and $20 million for a D-Wave Advantage2 (Florida Atlantic University, 2026); IBM's utility-scale on-premise systems carry no published purchase price. That capital cost is why almost everyone accesses quantum through the cloud instead. Use the calculator to price a specific job.

What is the cheapest way to run a quantum circuit?

For shot-metered gate-model access, AWS Braket on the Rigetti Cepheus-108Q is the cheapest per-shot option at $0.000425/shot, so a 10,000-shot circuit costs about $4.55 including the $0.30 task fee. IBM's Open Plan is free for up to 10 minutes of QPU runtime per month. The trade-off with the cheapest superconducting hardware is lower two-qubit gate fidelity than trapped-ion machines, so deep circuits may need more shots.

How much does AWS Braket cost?

Every QPU task on AWS Braket costs $0.30, plus a per-shot rate set by the device: Rigetti Cepheus $0.000425, IQM Garnet $0.00145, IQM Emerald $0.00160, QuEra Aquila $0.01000, AQT IBEX-Q1 $0.02350, IonQ Forte $0.08000. A 10,000-shot circuit therefore costs about $4.55 on Rigetti Cepheus and about $800.30 on IonQ Forte. Braket Direct reservations for dedicated hourly access run $2,500 an hour on QuEra Aquila up to $7,000 an hour on IonQ Forte. On-demand simulators bill per minute of runtime with a three-second minimum per simulation. Verified at aws.amazon.com/braket/pricing on 7 September 2026.

How much does IBM Quantum cost?

IBM bills QPU runtime by the minute. The Open Plan is free for up to 10 minutes of runtime per month. Pay-As-You-Go is $96 per minute with a 1-second minimum purchase. Flex starts at $72 per minute against a 400-minute annual minimum, a floor of $28,800 a year. Premium starts at $48 per minute against a 5,200-minute annual minimum, a floor of $249,600 a year. On-Prem is quoted. Flex only beats Pay-As-You-Go above 300 QPU-minutes a year, because 400 minutes at $72 costs the same as 300 minutes at $96. Verified at ibm.com/quantum/pricing on 7 September 2026.

Why is quantum computing so expensive?

Quantum processors need specialised, low-utilisation infrastructure: dilution refrigerators near absolute zero for superconducting qubits, or ultra-high-vacuum ion traps and laser systems for trapped-ion machines. Each job occupies the device exclusively, so providers meter access tightly, by shot, by QPU-minute or by monthly subscription. The result is a price span of more than 180x per shot between the cheapest and most expensive gate-model devices, which is why estimating a specific job matters more than a single headline rate.

References

  1. AWS Braket Pricing. Amazon Web Services. Accessed 2026-09-07, cross-checked against the AWS Price List API Braket offer file, publication 2026-08-31. https://aws.amazon.com/braket/pricing/
  2. Azure Quantum Pricing Plans. Microsoft Learn. Doc updated 2026-04-23, accessed 2026-09-07. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/quantum/pricing
  3. IBM Quantum Flex Plan. IBM Quantum Blog, Q1 2026. https://www.ibm.com/quantum/blog/flex-plan
  4. Anastasi, P. IBM's New Flex Plan Fills a Big Gap in Quantum Access Pricing. Moor Insights & Strategy, 2026. https://moorinsightsstrategy.com/research-notes/ibms-new-flex-plan-fills-a-big-gap-in-quantum-access-pricing/
  5. Acharya, R. et al. Quantum error correction below the surface code threshold. Nature, December 2024. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-08449-y
  6. Microsoft & Quantinuum. 12 logical qubits + hybrid end-to-end chemistry simulation. Azure Quantum Blog, September 2024. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/quantum/2024/09/10/microsoft-and-quantinuum-create-12-logical-qubits-and-demonstrate-a-hybrid-end-to-end-chemistry-simulation/
  7. Rigetti Computing. General Availability of 108-Qubit System. April 2026 press release. https://thequantuminsider.com/2026/04/08/rigetti-108-qubit-system-availability/
  8. IonQ. Accelerating Towards Fault Tolerance: 99.99% Two-Qubit Gate. October 2025. https://www.ionq.com/blog/accelerating-towards-fault-tolerance-unlocking-99-99-two-qubit-gate
  9. Google Quantum AI. Willow Early Access Program. Accessed 2026-09-07. https://quantumai.google/willowearlyaccess
  10. QuEra Computing. Aquila device on AWS Braket. arXiv:2306.11727. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.11727
  11. D-Wave Quantum. Advantage2 General Availability. Press release, 2025. https://www.dwavequantum.com/company/newsroom/press-release/d-wave-announces-general-availability-of-advantage2-quantum-computer-its-most-advanced-and-performant-system/
  12. Amazon Braket supported regions and devices. AWS Developer Guide. Accessed 2026-09-07; IonQ Aria is no longer on the supported-device list. https://docs.aws.amazon.com/braket/latest/developerguide/braket-devices.html
  13. AWS Price List API, Amazon Braket offer file. Publication 2026-08-31, retrieved 2026-09-07. https://pricing.us-east-1.amazonaws.com/offers/v1.0/aws/AmazonBraket/current/index.json
  14. D-Wave Quantum. Quantum Computing for Developers (Leap trial allowances). Accessed 2026-09-07. https://www.dwavequantum.com/solutions-and-products/developer/

Independent reference. No affiliate revenue. No vendor sponsorships. Corrections: [email protected].