Azure Quantum — IonQ Aria 1 (PAYG)
Per-program AQT formula with minimum. $97.50 minimum per execution with error mitigation on (default). $12.42 with mitigation off.
1.Representative workload costs
Concrete circuit costs for common workload sizes. Where the pricing model is non-linear (per-program minimums, per-month subscriptions), the table surfaces the floor and break-even points.
Table 1 — Workload cost reference
| Workload | Cost (USD) | Note |
|---|---|---|
| Single mitigation-on program (minimum) | $97.50 | Floor cost. Run as many shots as the program allows within this. |
| Single mitigation-off program (minimum) | $12.42 | 8x cheaper if mitigation is not required. |
| Sustained workload: 100 programs × 1k shots | $9,750+ | Per-program minimum compounds. Batch into fewer larger programs where possible. |
2.Structural hardware advantage
Same IonQ Aria hardware as Braket. Azure pricing model differs — pays for paradigm-fit when your workload runs many short tasks vs Braket's per-shot model.
3.Position in the 2026 stack
Production, transitioning. Azure documentation still references Aria 1 prominently; IonQ's strategic emphasis is shifting to Forte.
4.Best-fit workloads
- Workloads naturally structured as larger batched programs
- Buyers who want to opt out of error mitigation (the $12.42 path)
- Azure-native quantum pipelines
5.Pricing trap
6.Source
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/quantum/pricing · verified 2026-06-03
See also: all providers index · methodology · comparative tables